Simplified schematic of a volcanic plume ejecting ash, crystals and fragments of rock from a vent. This rising plume will eventually hit a zone of neutral buoyancy in the atmosphere, where it is then carried by the wind. Material is ejected from both the upward moving jet and falls from the umbrellaing plume.
Images
Volcano Science Center images.
Simplified schematic of a volcanic plume ejecting ash, crystals and fragments of rock from a vent. This rising plume will eventually hit a zone of neutral buoyancy in the atmosphere, where it is then carried by the wind. Material is ejected from both the upward moving jet and falls from the umbrellaing plume.
Map of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National Park
Map of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National ParkMap showing the Roadside Springs thermal area, located just north of Nymph Lake along the Norris-Mammoth highway. Hydrothermal ground is shaded purple. New hydrothermal features formed in 2003 on the north side of Nymph Lake, and also in 2024 a bit further north from the lake. Figure by Jefferson Hungerford, Yellowstone National Park.
Map of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National Park
Map of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National ParkMap showing the Roadside Springs thermal area, located just north of Nymph Lake along the Norris-Mammoth highway. Hydrothermal ground is shaded purple. New hydrothermal features formed in 2003 on the north side of Nymph Lake, and also in 2024 a bit further north from the lake. Figure by Jefferson Hungerford, Yellowstone National Park.
Range of speeds for several animals, athletes, and magmas from various volcanic eruptions.
Range of speeds for several animals, athletes, and magmas from various volcanic eruptions.Range of speeds for several animals, athletes, and magmas from various volcanic eruptions. Eruptions shown include the 25,400-year-old Oruanui eruption of Taupo (New Zealand), the 2.08-million-year-old Huckleberry Ridge Tuff of Yellowstone (USA), and the 767,000-year-old Bishop Tuff of Long Valley (USA). Magma ascent rates determined by Myers et al. (2018).
Range of speeds for several animals, athletes, and magmas from various volcanic eruptions.
Range of speeds for several animals, athletes, and magmas from various volcanic eruptions.Range of speeds for several animals, athletes, and magmas from various volcanic eruptions. Eruptions shown include the 25,400-year-old Oruanui eruption of Taupo (New Zealand), the 2.08-million-year-old Huckleberry Ridge Tuff of Yellowstone (USA), and the 767,000-year-old Bishop Tuff of Long Valley (USA). Magma ascent rates determined by Myers et al. (2018).
Aerial view of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National Park
Aerial view of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National ParkAerial view looking to the west at the Roadside Springs hydrothermal area and Nymph Lake showing the locations of thermal features that formed in 2003 and 2024. Yellow line marks the Mammoth-Norris highway. Figure by Jefferson Hungerford, Yellowstone National Park.
Aerial view of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National Park
Aerial view of Roadside Springs thermal area, Yellowstone National ParkAerial view looking to the west at the Roadside Springs hydrothermal area and Nymph Lake showing the locations of thermal features that formed in 2003 and 2024. Yellow line marks the Mammoth-Norris highway. Figure by Jefferson Hungerford, Yellowstone National Park.
Map of the Northwestern United States showing major volcanic features associated with the Yellowstone mantle plume
Map of the Northwestern United States showing major volcanic features associated with the Yellowstone mantle plumeMap of the Northwestern United States showing major volcanic features associated with the mantle plume currently underneath Yellowstone caldera. Colors indicate general basaltic (blues) versus rhyolitic (reds) compositions, with shades indicating age (darker shades are older). Rough outlines of calderas that formed due to the Yellowstone hotspot are give
Map of the Northwestern United States showing major volcanic features associated with the Yellowstone mantle plume
Map of the Northwestern United States showing major volcanic features associated with the Yellowstone mantle plumeMap of the Northwestern United States showing major volcanic features associated with the mantle plume currently underneath Yellowstone caldera. Colors indicate general basaltic (blues) versus rhyolitic (reds) compositions, with shades indicating age (darker shades are older). Rough outlines of calderas that formed due to the Yellowstone hotspot are give
Geologic domains of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Geologic domains of the Greater Yellowstone EcosystemMap of the geologic domains of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). Boundaries are approximate.
Geologic domains of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Geologic domains of the Greater Yellowstone EcosystemMap of the geologic domains of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). Boundaries are approximate.
Schematic showing magma storage beneath Yellowstone caldera based on magnetotelluric data
Schematic showing magma storage beneath Yellowstone caldera based on magnetotelluric dataSchematic showing magma storage beneath Yellowstone caldera. Nested calderas resulting from the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff, Mesa Falls Tuff, and Lava Creek Tuff caldera forming eruptions are shown as solid black, green, and orange lines, respectively.
Schematic showing magma storage beneath Yellowstone caldera based on magnetotelluric data
Schematic showing magma storage beneath Yellowstone caldera based on magnetotelluric dataSchematic showing magma storage beneath Yellowstone caldera. Nested calderas resulting from the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff, Mesa Falls Tuff, and Lava Creek Tuff caldera forming eruptions are shown as solid black, green, and orange lines, respectively.
Presentation: The Challenge of Volcano Monitoring, Eruption Forecasting, and Protecting Vulnerable Populations
Presentation: The Challenge of Volcano Monitoring, Eruption Forecasting, and Protecting Vulnerable PopulationsThis presentation was prepared for the AGU 2024-2025 Distinguished Lecture Series. This, and other lectures, provide a high-level synthesis of different topics for general science audiences.
This presentation discusses the challenge of volcano monitoring, eruption forecasting, and protecting vulnerable populations.
Presentation: The Challenge of Volcano Monitoring, Eruption Forecasting, and Protecting Vulnerable Populations
Presentation: The Challenge of Volcano Monitoring, Eruption Forecasting, and Protecting Vulnerable PopulationsThis presentation was prepared for the AGU 2024-2025 Distinguished Lecture Series. This, and other lectures, provide a high-level synthesis of different topics for general science audiences.
This presentation discusses the challenge of volcano monitoring, eruption forecasting, and protecting vulnerable populations.
Organizational chart for the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory in the event of a response to a geological hazard
Organizational chart for the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory in the event of a response to a geological hazardOrganization chart giving the structure of a response by the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory to a significant episode of unrest or eruption at the Yellowstone volcanic system. The strategy is scalable (elements are activated as they are needed and deactivated when they are no longer needed) and can be adapted to meet the needs of the event response.
Organizational chart for the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory in the event of a response to a geological hazard
Organizational chart for the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory in the event of a response to a geological hazardOrganization chart giving the structure of a response by the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory to a significant episode of unrest or eruption at the Yellowstone volcanic system. The strategy is scalable (elements are activated as they are needed and deactivated when they are no longer needed) and can be adapted to meet the needs of the event response.
Map of earthquakes in the Yellowstone National Park region in 2024
Map of earthquakes in the Yellowstone National Park region in 2024Map of seismicity (red circles) in the Yellowstone region during 2024. Gray lines are roads, black dashed line shows the caldera boundary, Yellowstone National Park is outlined by black dot-dashed line, and gray dashed lines denote state boundaries.
Map of earthquakes in the Yellowstone National Park region in 2024
Map of earthquakes in the Yellowstone National Park region in 2024Map of seismicity (red circles) in the Yellowstone region during 2024. Gray lines are roads, black dashed line shows the caldera boundary, Yellowstone National Park is outlined by black dot-dashed line, and gray dashed lines denote state boundaries.
Comparison of steep subduction and flat-slab subduction
Comparison of steep subduction and flat-slab subductionComparison of steep subduction (like that occurring today beneath the Pacific Northwest of the United States) and flat-slab subduction (which led to the formation of the Rocky Mountains a few tens of millions of years ago). Black arrows indicate the relative direction of movement of the oceanic plate.
Comparison of steep subduction and flat-slab subduction
Comparison of steep subduction and flat-slab subductionComparison of steep subduction (like that occurring today beneath the Pacific Northwest of the United States) and flat-slab subduction (which led to the formation of the Rocky Mountains a few tens of millions of years ago). Black arrows indicate the relative direction of movement of the oceanic plate.
This example shows areas where seismic waves travel more quickly in blue, and slower areas in red, beneath the western United States. Faults are black lines, and blue line is the San Andreas Fault.
This example shows areas where seismic waves travel more quickly in blue, and slower areas in red, beneath the western United States. Faults are black lines, and blue line is the San Andreas Fault.
Photo and cartoon of 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake deposit in Henrys Lake (ID) sediment core, along with Cesium-137 levels
Photo and cartoon of 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake deposit in Henrys Lake (ID) sediment core, along with Cesium-137 levelsPhoto and cartoon of 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake deposit in sediment core from Henrys Lake, Idaho, with references to Cesium-137 activity (or concentration). Changes in Cesium-137 are related to atmospheric nuclear tests and provide a means of dating the deposit; those measurements are plotted on the right with depth (in cm) of the core.
Photo and cartoon of 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake deposit in Henrys Lake (ID) sediment core, along with Cesium-137 levels
Photo and cartoon of 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake deposit in Henrys Lake (ID) sediment core, along with Cesium-137 levelsPhoto and cartoon of 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake deposit in sediment core from Henrys Lake, Idaho, with references to Cesium-137 activity (or concentration). Changes in Cesium-137 are related to atmospheric nuclear tests and provide a means of dating the deposit; those measurements are plotted on the right with depth (in cm) of the core.
Photoscans and computed tomography of sediment cores from Henrys Lake, Idaho
Photoscans and computed tomography of sediment cores from Henrys Lake, IdahoTransect of sediment cores from Henrys Lake, Idaho. (a) High‐resolution photoscans and computed tomography (CT) of each core correspond to the location tie line. White line on CT represents gamma ray attenuation bulk density (g/cc). Mapped facies are right of each correspondent core. Shades of gray represent background sedimentation and the event deposit by orange.
Photoscans and computed tomography of sediment cores from Henrys Lake, Idaho
Photoscans and computed tomography of sediment cores from Henrys Lake, IdahoTransect of sediment cores from Henrys Lake, Idaho. (a) High‐resolution photoscans and computed tomography (CT) of each core correspond to the location tie line. White line on CT represents gamma ray attenuation bulk density (g/cc). Mapped facies are right of each correspondent core. Shades of gray represent background sedimentation and the event deposit by orange.
Map of thermal areas in Yellowstone National Park (2024)
Map of thermal areas in Yellowstone National Park (2024)Map of thermal areas from ground-based mapping and remote-sensing methods compiled by Vaughn et al., 2024 (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/661d5eb7d34e7eb9eb7e3a41).
Map of thermal areas in Yellowstone National Park (2024)
Map of thermal areas in Yellowstone National Park (2024)Map of thermal areas from ground-based mapping and remote-sensing methods compiled by Vaughn et al., 2024 (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/661d5eb7d34e7eb9eb7e3a41).
Hazy conditions caused by sulfur dioxide emissions from Kīlauea, Hawai‘i
Hazy conditions caused by sulfur dioxide emissions from Kīlauea, Hawai‘iHazy conditions caused by sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from Halema‘uma‘u crater, Kīlauea, Hawai‘i. USGS photo by Jennifer Lewicki, December 25, 2024.
Hazy conditions caused by sulfur dioxide emissions from Kīlauea, Hawai‘i
Hazy conditions caused by sulfur dioxide emissions from Kīlauea, Hawai‘iHazy conditions caused by sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from Halema‘uma‘u crater, Kīlauea, Hawai‘i. USGS photo by Jennifer Lewicki, December 25, 2024.
Kīlauea summit caldera from B1 camera on December 20, 2024
Kīlauea summit caldera from B1 camera on December 20, 2024View of Kaluapele (Kīlauea's summit caldera) from the B1 webcam on December 20, 2024, just before the onset of the episodic lava fountaining eruption on December 23.
Kīlauea summit caldera from B1 camera on December 20, 2024
Kīlauea summit caldera from B1 camera on December 20, 2024View of Kaluapele (Kīlauea's summit caldera) from the B1 webcam on December 20, 2024, just before the onset of the episodic lava fountaining eruption on December 23.
Modern vegetation on different geological substrates in Yellowstone
Modern vegetation on different geological substrates in YellowstoneModern vegetation on different geological substrates in Yellowstone. Left: steppe/grassland on glacial clay found in places like Lamar and Hayden Valleys. Center: Mixed conifer forest in the Absaroka andesite volcanic field in the eastern part of Yellowstone National Park. Right: Lodgepole pine forest on Central Plateau rhyolite (hydrothermal grass
Modern vegetation on different geological substrates in Yellowstone
Modern vegetation on different geological substrates in YellowstoneModern vegetation on different geological substrates in Yellowstone. Left: steppe/grassland on glacial clay found in places like Lamar and Hayden Valleys. Center: Mixed conifer forest in the Absaroka andesite volcanic field in the eastern part of Yellowstone National Park. Right: Lodgepole pine forest on Central Plateau rhyolite (hydrothermal grass
Vegetation history based on pollen records from three small lakes on different geological substrates in Yellowstone National Park
Vegetation history based on pollen records from three small lakes on different geological substrates in Yellowstone National ParkVegetation history based on pollen records from three small lakes on different geological substrates in Yellowstone National Park. Blue is open vegetation, light green is parkland, dark green is forest. Top plot is from Slough Creek Pond, in a present grassland area dominated by glacial and lake sediment in the northeast part of Yellowstone Nationa
Vegetation history based on pollen records from three small lakes on different geological substrates in Yellowstone National Park
Vegetation history based on pollen records from three small lakes on different geological substrates in Yellowstone National ParkVegetation history based on pollen records from three small lakes on different geological substrates in Yellowstone National Park. Blue is open vegetation, light green is parkland, dark green is forest. Top plot is from Slough Creek Pond, in a present grassland area dominated by glacial and lake sediment in the northeast part of Yellowstone Nationa
Update on seismic activity at Mount Adams from September 2024 to early November 2024
Update on seismic activity at Mount Adams from September 2024 to early November 2024Volcanoes tend to have seismicity that waxes and wanes over time. That’s considered normal and not necessarily a cause for concern. Let’s check on Mount Adams to see what USGS scientists are doing to learn more about its recent earthquake activity and what it could mean for this Cascade Range volcano.
Update on seismic activity at Mount Adams from September 2024 to early November 2024
Update on seismic activity at Mount Adams from September 2024 to early November 2024Volcanoes tend to have seismicity that waxes and wanes over time. That’s considered normal and not necessarily a cause for concern. Let’s check on Mount Adams to see what USGS scientists are doing to learn more about its recent earthquake activity and what it could mean for this Cascade Range volcano.
Graphic showing how InSAR detects ground deformation
Graphic showing how InSAR detects ground deformationGraphic showing how InSAR detects ground deformation by measuring changes in the signal that bounces off the Earth. Figure by the EarthScope Consortium.
Graphic showing how InSAR detects ground deformation
Graphic showing how InSAR detects ground deformationGraphic showing how InSAR detects ground deformation by measuring changes in the signal that bounces off the Earth. Figure by the EarthScope Consortium.