Scientists reported the discovery of three neonicotinoid pesticides in drinking water and their potential for transformation and removal during water treatment. The research provides new insights into the persistence of neonicotinoids and their potential for transformation during water treatment and distribution, while also identifying granulated activated carbon as a potentially effective management tool for decreasing neonicotinoid concentrations in finished drinking water.
Neonicotinoids are widely used insecticides for control of insects in urban and agricultural areas. These pesticides have gained popularity owing to their potency and their selective toxicity for insects, which limits acute toxicity for nontarget animals. However, because of their widespread use, neonicotinoids commonly are detected in surface waters and groundwaters and have been detected in tap water samples in Iowa and other areas of the United States.

Neonicotinoids break down to metabolites in the environment through microbial degradation and abiotic processes (for example, photolysis and hydrolysis). As a result, metabolites are present in surface waters, some of which are used as sources of drinking water. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reported neonicotinoids in treated drinking water and demonstrated that metabolites can form from select neonicotinoids during disinfection processes where neonicotinoid metabolites and parent compounds react with chlorine, leading to potentially toxic next-generation disinfection byproducts.
University of Iowa and USGS scientists studied neonicotinoid metabolites in raw and treated drinking water samples collected from the University of Iowa and the Iowa City drinking water treatment plants after maize and soy planting. Both of these facilities use free chlorine disinfection. Tap water samples also were collected from two buildings on the University of Iowa campus and three residences in the Iowa City distribution system.
Clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam were detected in finished water samples at concentrations ranging from 0.24 to 57.3 nanograms per liter. Samples collected along the University of Iowa treatment train indicate no apparent removal of clothianidin or imidacloprid, with modest thiamethoxam removal (about 50 percent). In contrast, the concentrations of all neonicotinoids were substantially lower in the Iowa City treatment facility water after using granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration. GAC filtration rapidly and nearly completely removed all three neonicotinoids; however, follow-up studies determined GAC filtration is less effective at removing imidacloprid metabolites than the parent compound. The scientists also determined that clothianidin is susceptible to reaction with free chlorine and may undergo at least partial transformation during chlorination.
Understanding the identity, fate, and bioactivity of transformation products generated in natural and engineered systems is critical to understanding human and wildlife exposure. This work provides new insights into the persistence of neonicotinoids and their potential for transformation during water treatment and distribution.
This study was funded by University of Iowa Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contamination (Grant 18018213 BR05); a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship; and the USGS Environmental Health Program (Contaminant Biology and Toxic Substances Hydrology), which is part of the USGS Ecosystems Mission Area.
Related science listed below.
Clothianidin Exposure Associated with Changes in Tadpole Behavior
Environmental Health Program Drinking Water Science
Mixtures of Organic and Inorganic Chemicals Characterized in Water from the Taps of Residences in the Greater Chicago Area— Science to Understand Contaminant Exposures in Drinking Water
Effect of Chronic Neonicotinoid Insecticide Exposure upon Monarch Development
Scientists Examined Native Pollinator Exposure Risk to Neonicotinoids in Native Prairie Strips
Do Neonicotinoid Pesticide Seed Coatings Pose a Hazard to Seed-eating Birds?
Related publications listed below.
Chlorinated byproducts of neonicotinoids and their metabolites: An unrecognized human exposure potential?
Differences in neonicotinoid and metabolite sorption to activated carbon are driven by alterations to the insecticidal pharmacophore
Reconnaissance of mixed organic and inorganic chemicals in private and public supply tapwaters at selected residential and workplace sites in the United States
Safe drinking water at the point-of-use (tapwater, TW) is a United States public health priority. Multiple lines of evidence were used to evaluate potential human health concerns of 482 organics and 19 inorganics in TW from 13 (7 public supply, 6 private well self-supply) home and 12 (public supply) workplace locations in 11 states. Only uranium (61.9 μg L–1, private well) exceeded a National Prim
Occurrence of neonicotinoid insecticides in finished drinking water and fate during drinking water treatment
- Overview
Scientists reported the discovery of three neonicotinoid pesticides in drinking water and their potential for transformation and removal during water treatment. The research provides new insights into the persistence of neonicotinoids and their potential for transformation during water treatment and distribution, while also identifying granulated activated carbon as a potentially effective management tool for decreasing neonicotinoid concentrations in finished drinking water.
Neonicotinoids are widely used insecticides for control of insects in urban and agricultural areas. These pesticides have gained popularity owing to their potency and their selective toxicity for insects, which limits acute toxicity for nontarget animals. However, because of their widespread use, neonicotinoids commonly are detected in surface waters and groundwaters and have been detected in tap water samples in Iowa and other areas of the United States.
Sources/Usage: Public Domain. Visit Media to see details.Neonicotinoids have been reported in treated drinking water. Neonicotinoids break down to metabolites in the environment through microbial degradation and abiotic processes (for example, photolysis and hydrolysis). As a result, metabolites are present in surface waters, some of which are used as sources of drinking water. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reported neonicotinoids in treated drinking water and demonstrated that metabolites can form from select neonicotinoids during disinfection processes where neonicotinoid metabolites and parent compounds react with chlorine, leading to potentially toxic next-generation disinfection byproducts.
University of Iowa and USGS scientists studied neonicotinoid metabolites in raw and treated drinking water samples collected from the University of Iowa and the Iowa City drinking water treatment plants after maize and soy planting. Both of these facilities use free chlorine disinfection. Tap water samples also were collected from two buildings on the University of Iowa campus and three residences in the Iowa City distribution system.
Scientist preparing for granular activated carbon sorption experiments. Clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam were detected in finished water samples at concentrations ranging from 0.24 to 57.3 nanograms per liter. Samples collected along the University of Iowa treatment train indicate no apparent removal of clothianidin or imidacloprid, with modest thiamethoxam removal (about 50 percent). In contrast, the concentrations of all neonicotinoids were substantially lower in the Iowa City treatment facility water after using granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration. GAC filtration rapidly and nearly completely removed all three neonicotinoids; however, follow-up studies determined GAC filtration is less effective at removing imidacloprid metabolites than the parent compound. The scientists also determined that clothianidin is susceptible to reaction with free chlorine and may undergo at least partial transformation during chlorination.
Understanding the identity, fate, and bioactivity of transformation products generated in natural and engineered systems is critical to understanding human and wildlife exposure. This work provides new insights into the persistence of neonicotinoids and their potential for transformation during water treatment and distribution.
This study was funded by University of Iowa Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contamination (Grant 18018213 BR05); a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship; and the USGS Environmental Health Program (Contaminant Biology and Toxic Substances Hydrology), which is part of the USGS Ecosystems Mission Area.
- Science
Related science listed below.
Clothianidin Exposure Associated with Changes in Tadpole Behavior
During a laboratory exposure study, tadpole movement decreased with increased concentrations of clothianidin, a neonicotinoid pesticide. Decreased movement could affect a tadpole’s ability to forage, escape predation, and metamorphose before ponds dry.Environmental Health Program Drinking Water Science
Drinking water in the United States rarely is tested for contaminants and pathogens at the tap, where human exposure can occur. In this special issue, we present the science to help understand contaminants and pathogens in drinking water at business and residential taps.Mixtures of Organic and Inorganic Chemicals Characterized in Water from the Taps of Residences in the Greater Chicago Area— Science to Understand Contaminant Exposures in Drinking Water
As a component of ongoing research with a coalition of partners, including the U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Colorado School of Mines, University of Illinois Chicago, and University of South Carolina, water was collected from the taps of 45 Chicago-area residences and analyzed for 540 organic and 35 inorganic...Effect of Chronic Neonicotinoid Insecticide Exposure upon Monarch Development
The long-term viability of monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) populations in North America is in doubt.Scientists Examined Native Pollinator Exposure Risk to Neonicotinoids in Native Prairie Strips
Neonicotinoids were not detected in native prairie plants placed next to agricultural fields several years after discontinuation of neonicotinoid seed treatment. In addition, neonicotinoid concentrations were lower or absent in soils and runoff at sites with the native prairie strips.Do Neonicotinoid Pesticide Seed Coatings Pose a Hazard to Seed-eating Birds?
Treating or “dressing” of seeds with pesticides is a commonly used method to enhance crop yield in agriculture. Regrettably, such treated seeds can be ingested by wildlife, and depending on the extent of exposure, can cause adverse effects. - Publications
Related publications listed below.
Chlorinated byproducts of neonicotinoids and their metabolites: An unrecognized human exposure potential?
We recently reported the initial discovery of neonicotinoid pesticides in drinking water and their potential for transformation through chlorination and alkaline hydrolysis during water treatment. The objectives of this research were: (1) to determine if neonicotinoid metabolites are relevant to drinking water exposure and (2) to identify the products formed from chlorination of neonicotinoids andAuthorsKathryn L. Klarich Wong, Danielle T. Webb, Matthew R. Nagorzanski, Dana W. Kolpin, Michelle L. Hladik, David M. Cwiertny, Gregory H. LeFevreDifferences in neonicotinoid and metabolite sorption to activated carbon are driven by alterations to the insecticidal pharmacophore
Widespread application of neonicotinoids has led to their proliferation in waters. Despite low neonicotinoid hydrophobicity, our prior studies implicated granular activated carbon (GAC) in neonicotinoid removal. Based on known receptor binding characteristics, we hypothesized that the insecticidal pharmacophore influences neonicotinoid sorption. Our objectives were to illuminate drivers of neonicoAuthorsDanielle T. Webb, Matthew R. Nagorzanski, Megan M Powers, David M. Cwiertny, Michelle Hladik, Gregory H. LeFevreReconnaissance of mixed organic and inorganic chemicals in private and public supply tapwaters at selected residential and workplace sites in the United States
Safe drinking water at the point-of-use (tapwater, TW) is a United States public health priority. Multiple lines of evidence were used to evaluate potential human health concerns of 482 organics and 19 inorganics in TW from 13 (7 public supply, 6 private well self-supply) home and 12 (public supply) workplace locations in 11 states. Only uranium (61.9 μg L–1, private well) exceeded a National Prim
AuthorsPaul M. Bradley, Dana W. Kolpin, Kristin M. Romanok, Kelly L. Smalling, Michael J. Focazio, Juliane B. Brown, Mary C. Cardon, Kurt D. Carpenter, Steven R. Corsi, Laura A. DeCicco, Julie E. Dietze, Nicola Evans, Edward T. Furlong, Carrie E. Givens, James L. Gray, Dale W. Griffin, Christopher P. Higgins, Michelle L. Hladik, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Celeste A. Journey, Kathryn Kuivila, Jason R. Masoner, Carrie A. McDonough, Michael T. Meyer, James L. Orlando, Mark J. Strynar, Christopher P. Weis, Vickie S. WilsonByEcosystems Mission Area, Water Resources Mission Area, Contaminant Biology, Environmental Health Program, Toxic Substances Hydrology, California Water Science Center, Central Midwest Water Science Center, Colorado Water Science Center, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Kansas Water Science Center, New Jersey Water Science Center, Oregon Water Science Center, South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC), St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, Upper Midwest Water Science Center, National Water Quality LaboratoryOccurrence of neonicotinoid insecticides in finished drinking water and fate during drinking water treatment
Neonicotinoid insecticides are widespread in surface waters across the agriculturally-intensive Midwestern US. We report for the first time the presence of three neonicotinoids in finished drinking water and demonstrate their general persistence during conventional water treatment. Periodic tap water grab samples were collected at the University of Iowa over seven weeks in 2016 (May-July) after maAuthorsKathryn L. Klarich, Nicholas C. Pflug, Eden M. DeWald, Michelle L. Hladik, Dana W. Kolpin, David M. Cwiertny, Gergory H. LeFevre