Work on the next version, NLCD 2001, represented a new generation. It used a database approach of interlinked data layers. Development for NLCD 2001, with imagery targeted for that year, began in 1999 and overhauled the methods used to make it and the land cover classes it yielded.
NLCD 2001 also added Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Alaska—the last being a significant achievement, considering Alaska is a fifth the size of the conterminous United States.
Using both Landsat 5 and Landsat 7 gave NLCD 2001 a distinct advantage over NLCD 92. Having twice the available imagery meant a better chance of getting cloud-free imagery showing phenology, or vegetation at about the same time of year, which was essential for NLCD 2001 to use more advanced and automated interpretation techniques.
The satellite imagery was used in collaboration with aerial photos to which map attributes had been added. These photos provided training data for certain types of land cover, such as developed urban areas and forest, that could easily be identified. A significant amount of other training data required scoping out areas of land cover in person.
Alaska was another matter. With a relatively short growing season, and very active cloud layers throughout the growing season, cloud-free Landsat imagery was very rare, let alone large areas of the landscape with matched phenology. With its vast remote areas, Alaska also lacked aerial imagery for the majority of the state. Given both of these factors, training data for the algorithms required large amounts of on-the-ground field data collection paired with extensive modeling and imagery combinations for accurate classification.
NLCD 2001 reduced the number of land cover classes to 16 (with four additional classes in Alaska only) and retooled class definitions to align with satellite-detected land cover conditions and put less emphasis on interpreting land usage. The NLCD 2001 classes simplified the agricultural and barren categories, but also changed to four classes of developed area representing the percentage of developed impervious surfaces that water cannot penetrate, such as pavement or roads or roofs.
EROS also developed a separate percent tree canopy data layer that categorized the different densities of forest around the nation. Used in combination with land cover and percent developed impervious surface data, this allowed users to understand, for example, the density of forest over developed areas, or low density forest encroachment into rangeland areas.
Other federal agencies and several states helped with NLCD 2001 mapping as well. For example, NOAA and USGS’ GAP mapped the majority of the coastal regions, and Kentucky mapped the state’s impervious surfaces.
Left: The current NLCD classes, with 16 across the United States and Puerto Rico and an additional 4 for Alaska only.